An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth by B. Russell

By B. Russell

Bertrand Russell is anxious during this e-book with the rules of data. He ways his topic via a dialogue of language, the relationships of fact to adventure and an research into how wisdom of the constitution of language is helping our realizing of the constitution of the world.

This variation contains a new advent by means of Thomas Baldwin, Clare university, Cambridge

Show description

Read Online or Download An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth PDF

Similar logic & language books

The Mathematics of Plato's Academy: A New Reconstruction

This is often an up to date version of a groundbreaking exam of early Greek arithmetic. the writer has revised elements of the textual content, up-to-date the bibliography, and extra a brand new Appendix the place he's taking a robust place within the carrying on with debate concerning the nature and variety of classical arithmetic. the 1st half provides a number of new interpretations of the assumption of ratio in early Greek arithmetic and illustrates those in exact discussions of a number of texts.

Mathematical Linguistics

Mathematical Linguistics introduces the mathematical foundations of linguistics to laptop scientists, engineers, and mathematicians drawn to normal language processing. The publication offers linguistics as a cumulative physique of information from the floor up, with out previous wisdom of linguistics being assumed, protecting greater than the typical two-semester introductory path in linguistics.

Modalities: Philosophical Essays

In line with her previous ground-breaking axiomatization of quantified modal common sense, the papers accrued right here by means of the celebrated thinker Ruth Barcan Marcus conceal a lot floor within the improvement of her idea, spanning from 1961 to 1990. the 1st essay right here introduces subject matters at first considered as iconoclastic, resembling the need of identification, the at once referential function of right names as "tags", the Barcan formulation concerning the interaction of danger and lifestyles, and substitute interpretations of quantification.

Truth and Paradox: Solving the Riddles

Examine the sentence 'This sentence isn't really true'. apparently the sentence will be neither real nor no longer real, on discomfort of contradiction. Tim Maudlin units out a singular account of common sense and semantics which permits him to accommodate sure infamous paradoxes that have bedevilled philosophical theories of fact.

Additional resources for An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth

Sample text

It is interesting that language can state facts; it is also interesting that it can state falsehoods. When it states either,' it does so with a view to causing some action in the hearer; if the hearer is a slave, a child, or a dog, the result is achieved more simply b y using the imperative. There is, how­ ever, a difference between the effectiveness o f a lie and that o f the truth: a lie only produces the desired result so long as the truth is expected. In fact, no one could learn to speak unless truth were the rule: if, when your child sees a dog, you say “cat” , “ horse” , or “ crocodile” , at random, you will not be able to deceive him by saying “ dog” when it is not a dog.

A single grammatical sentence may not be logically single. “ I went out and found it was raining” is logically indistinguish­ able from the two sentences: “ I went out” , “ I found it was raining” . But the sentence “ when I went out I found it was raining” is logically single: it asserts that two occurrences were simultaneous. “ Caesar and Pompey were great generals” is logically two sentences, but “ Caesar and Pom pey were alike in being great generals” is logically one. For our purposes, it will be convenient to exclude sentences which are not logically single, but consist o f two assertions joined b y “ and” or “ but” or “ although” or some such conjunction.

It is a mole­ cular statement whose atoms are “ A occurred” and “ B occurred” . N ow what do we mean by “ A occurred” ? W e mean that there was a noise o f a certain class, the class called “ A ” . Thus when we say “ A preceded B” our statement has a concealed logical form, which is the same as that o f the statement: “ first there was the bark o f a dog, and then the neigh o f a horse” . Let us pursue this a little further. I say “ A ” . ” Then you reply “ you said ‘A ’ ” . N ow the noise you make when saying “ A ” in this reply is different from the noise I originally made; therefore, i f “ A ” were the name o f a particular noise, your statement would be false.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.46 of 5 – based on 42 votes